“In this case, Judge Kennedy wrote to the majority of the court that a government official who appeared before the petitioners and who sincerely quoted “his own” in defending slavery and the Holocaust, and I quote now, “showed too much hostility to the sincere religious belief that motivated his objection, said Hawley. At the heart of the lively exchange was a legal advisor Michael Bogren wrote when he represented the city of East Lansing, Michigan, in a religious freedom trial that began last year, he told Detroit Free Press. “Senator, what I’m trying to argue is that religious beliefs that seek to justify discrimination when it extends to sexual orientation – which protects the city of East Lansing – can be used to try to justify any other form of discrimination. Hawley failed to get a direct answer from Bogren as to whether the argument was consistent with his personal beliefs, and was frustrated by what he considered “fencing” and Bogren’s indirect answers. Bogren further explained that ‘he’ had included quoting a KKK website in ‘his’ argument to show that no ‘fundamental distinction’ could be made between a KKK member who prohibited interracial marriage to a family business and the present case. Bogren, now a candidate for the American District Court, was shot by Hawley when he refused to distance himself from the comments of his written argumentation comparing Tennessee’s religious business practices with the activities of Ku Klux Klan and radical Islamists. He argued that anyone who put forward this legal argument would not adequately confirm the Supreme Court’s decision on the decision of the Supreme Court’s Cakeshop masterpiece Cakeshop – such arguments relating to the defence of the candidates’ religious freedom were unacceptable. I am particularly surprised at the Court’s clear teaching that this kind of hostility and this kind of hate-mongering arrangement is not in line with the guarantees of our right,” concluded Mr Hawley. Josh Hawley from Missouri turned against a candidate for expressing “religious hostility” in his legal career. Farmer Steve Tennes began the case last June when his family farm, The Country Mill, was banned from selling products on a farmer’s market – citing his reluctance to allow same-sex marriages in his orchard. “Do you believe that Catholic families who refer to the teachings of your church are like a member of the CCC that calls for Christianity? “So you think these things are equivalent,” asked Hawley. “There is no difference,” answered Bogren. If you can justify discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, the lawyer said before he was interrupted. Sciascia has been a regular contributor to the Western Journal since September 2018 and also works briefly as a policy officer at MassGOP and is currently editor-in-chief of the student newspaper Connector. “What I have tried to explain, Senator.